The “Splinternet” is Bad News, and I blame Apple

January 27, 2010 at 9:45 am 6 comments

Josh Bernoff of Forrester Research has written a must-read post on the splintering of the Web, saying that the golden days of the standardized, open-source Web are over. He says we should prepare ourselves for a world in which platforms function well enough within their ecosystems, but are deaf to the rest of the universe around them.

Mobile devices and online networks are the most obvious examples. iPhone apps don’t work on a Blackberry, and vice versa. Facebook apps only work on Facebook. LinkedIn exists by itself in a corner of the world. Their citizens seem quite happy with this state of affairs.

I say it’s bad news, and Apple shares a large part of the blame.

From its beginnings, Apple has refused to play the open source game. It almost died in the 1990s when its closed-end desktop system nearly became irrelevant (except to graphic designers and school systems), but it saved itself by introducing a game-changing, closed-source music ecosystem, then by launching its closed-source, category-killing smartphone. See a pattern?

The irony is that Apple fan boys, who used to demonize Microsoft for its all-Windows-all-the-time dreams of world domination, look the other way when Apple rips pages from the same playbook. Apple will play with you, but only on its terms. Arrogance, anyone? (The same applies to RIM, Facebook and all the rest.)

But Apple’s shareholder value is through the roof, so others are emulating it. Those of us in marketing and communications must now develop on dozens of platforms, each mute to its neighbor, just to engage a critical mass of our markets or communities. Apple didn’t invent this trend, but the turtle-neck wearing guy from Cupertino made it not only acceptable, but admirable.

This is a betrayal of the ideals that made the Web such a revolutionary force – connectivity and community. Instead, these new platforms behave like toddlers on a play date – engaged in their own activities, unaware of the kid next to them. You can’t blame toddlers; their minds haven’t developed enough. Parallel play is all they can do. But these technology companies know better.

You might argue that this development is only the next stage in the 40-year-old fragmentation of communication platforms, but it’s worse than that. It’s a huge step backward for the information economy, isolating people from information and each other, and foisting exorbitant new development costs on to business. These rising costs can only exert a downward pressure on economic growth and prosperity. (Please: Don’t even try to sell me on the idea that the iPhone’s elegance is an excuse for this betrayal.)

Bernoff says it’s too late; that we can’t ask for a return of the standardized, interoperable web. I’m not willing to give up yet. If closed-source efforts at world domination were bad coming from Redmond, why are they so virtuous coming from Cupertino?

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Groundswell, social media, web strategy, websites.

Forrester Updates its Social Technographics Model UnTech 10: A Glimpse of the Future

6 Comments

  • 1. Cecilia Sepp  |  January 27, 2010 at 12:58 pm

    I haven’t thought of things this way, Frank, because I can currently find what I need when I need it.

    However, I have not paid attention to the fact that I have adopted using all these different pathways to get to people and information.

    I have no loyalty to Apple; the only product I have is the iPhone, and see no reason to buy any others. I chose the iPhone because it does what I need it to do, plus some.

    In my opinion, it’s a Windows world and that’s the one I live in — not out of loyalty, out of practicality.

  • 2. Karen Hochberg  |  January 28, 2010 at 12:17 pm

    It seem Frank you seek one platform on which to develop. And the trend is in opensource that the business model is free. How does one sustain a company and pay employees in a opensource environment.
    Yes, Microsoft and Apple both are heavy handed. The web is the most amazing thing I have experienced in mylife time. I can’t belive how it has opened my capacity to learn and access information.
    I am going to purchase the device that makes it easy for me to continue to do that. I will also pay a small bit more for elegance and innvoation.
    It is kind of like being mad a Walmart for forcing Americans companie to produce overseas or die. I think it is sad we are for sharholder value. But with the amount of people out of work and no sustainable model to support journalism. Is opensource really going to give us what we need? The innovation has come with peple making money off all of the new apps for the Iphone. They are migrating to RIM and the best ones will win. Just my thoughts.

  • 3. Frank Fortin  |  January 31, 2010 at 4:48 pm

    @Karen: I can’t fault people for using the technology that works best for them. I DO blame tech companies for doing their work on closed platforms, turning their back on the very quality that made the Internet great.

  • […] stoot ik op een post op de “Guilt by Association Blog” van  Frank Fortin met als titel “The Splinternet is Bad News, and I blame Apple.” In deze post wordt verwezen naar een artikel van Josh Bernoff  over de versplintering van het […]

  • 5. Simon  |  May 28, 2010 at 8:34 pm

    Its shareholder value Frank – pure and simple.

    This is the driving force of virtually all value.

    Google are the most open, but of course they are when it works to their economic advantage.

  • 6. Simon  |  May 28, 2010 at 8:35 pm

    Sorry, I meant to say

    “This is the driving force of virtually all corporate decisions and strategy”


Calendar

January 2010
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Feb »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Most Recent Posts


%d bloggers like this: